Andrey Shchekin's Blog - Latest Comments

Re: Simple typeswitch in C# 3.0, Part 2: The Solutions

Clarityx — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:30:29 -0000

Interesting post. Appreciate it as I have seen something new now.
Can I use this info on my blog using the direct link to your blog? Thanks in advance

Re: Putting Web snapshots to practical use

ashmind — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:29:19 -0000

Well I had crash I think, and that was related to the fact that text was not set -- it required at least "" to be provided.
But they have fixed it since, so now everything should work well.

I can't really give an example since all my usage is commercial and it is hard to untie a meaningful example from the app itself.

But can you provide the crash stack trace?

Re: Putting Web snapshots to practical use

Dmitri Nesteruk — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:19:01 -0000

Well, I drop a TextEditor component onto my form, and everhthing crashes. I suppose there is some 'proper' way to use it, but what I would really love is an example, because I could find none on the internet.

Re: Putting Web snapshots to practical use

ashmind — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:43:18 -0000

Ok, what exceptions are you getting? They might have broken something since the version I downloaded, or I could have occasionally set some options that is required by it to work correctly.

Re: Putting Web snapshots to practical use

Dmitri Nesteruk — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:40:24 -0000

Hi, I saw your post on StackOverflow regarding use of AvalonEdit, so I ended up downloading it and playing with it a bit. Unfortunately, after an hour of exception after exception, I gave up. So I was wondering if I could blatantly ask for your help :) because I really want this to get working, but with a 0% documentation level in the API, I'm finding actually using AvalonEdit to be hell on earth. Pleeease?

Re: XHTML and microformats revisited

harish — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:41:49 -0000

thanks for sharing this article that is very helpful to me.
but am not able to understand that what is the difference between the html and xhtml.
can you explain it in the brief.

Re: About

ashmind — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:02:43 -0000

Thanks for sharing, I'll definitely read it.
Sorry for the chat, but I was quite busy with my job today.

I'll comment with any thoughts after I read the article.

Re: About

Steve Gray — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:18:28 -0000

The article is now live at http://www.codeproject.com/KB/aspnet/advancedwe... if you're interested.

Re: About

Steve Gray — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:36:53 -0000

Hi, I was just about to post a tutorial on Code Project about generics in ASP .NET (using an example of the repeater to illustrate the point), and I've noticed there's a similar but different tutorial from you on there.

I just thought I'd give you a heads up, since my implementation seems at some levels very similar (I've also gone down the type, property delegation route), but also quite different (supporting *any* generic control types through marking up the types with attributes). Effectively what I do is mark up ITemplate properties with attributes saying which generic parameter indicies they refer to, and then instanciating the relevant container dynamically).

The control builder then uses an attribute on the 'concrete' class to specify the mapping of string properties to generic parameter indicies, allowing the real control to be instanciated.

I'd love to have a chat with you before I post the tutorial to get your input on it, since you may have evolved the idea further since that tutorial was posted.

Re: Google Chrome — short thoughts

stevenmartinez — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:43:29 -0000

Could not be published any better. Reading this post reminds me of my previous roommie! He always kept on discussing this. I will be forwarding this post to him. Pretty certain he will be benefcial. Thank you for sharing!

Re: NMock 3.5

Urs Enzler — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:42:36 -0000

Yes NMock2 is alive. But there is quite a bit room for confusion because you have to go to http://sourceforge.net/projects/nmock2/ and not nmock.org.
The reason is that the developers of NMock version 1.0 and 2.0 (nmock.org) have stopped their development and it is continued by another team on http://sourceforge.net/projects/nmock2/

Back to lambdas:
Do you have a solution that supports defining expectations on properties and indexers as well?

Happy mocking
Urs

Re: Comparing .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Part 2

Pavan Kulkarni — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:02:18 -0000

Fantastic comparison. Thanks for sharing

Re: Comparing .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Part 1

Pavan Kulkarni — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:25:41 -0000

Good article. I was looking for something like this.
Thanks for sharing!

Re: NMock 3.5

ashmind — Fri, 26 Dec 2008 05:58:52 -0000

Now that's interesting.
I am subscribed to their newsgroup and there was only occasional activity for almost a year (consistent with no releases for a while).
It seems that they started releasing and the discussions moved elsewhere so that's the reason for my error.

However unless they already support .NET 3.5 syntax, it still seems for me that MoQ is easier to use for NET 3.5 projects.

Re: NMock 3.5

Andrew — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 23:35:49 -0000

>NMock2 seems to be dead for a while now.

Latest release appears to be of December 06 2008 at sourceforge, and SVN statistics ( http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/detail.php... ) shows some checkins :)

Why do you think it's "dead for a while"?

Re: NMock 3.5

ashmind — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:49:34 -0000

Thanks! I really recommend looking at Moq, however, since NMock2 seems to be dead for a while now.
I have moved to Moq and it saved me from writing a whole new API for NMock2 just to get more modern syntax.

Also Moq people were very responsive at fixing bugs when they still had them.
I wish I could say the same about latest NMock2.

Re: NMock 3.5

Andrew — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:17:24 -0000

Andrey,

Nice one! I had a slightly different approach though (scroll downto "Improvements: NMock2 + C#3." at http://codevanced.net/post/Touching-a-hot-iron-... )

Re: Comparing .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Part 1

baliinc — Sat, 13 Dec 2008 06:21:08 -0000

great comparison, thanks for doing it. and it make's this thing clear in my brain

Re: Comparing .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Part 2

dewaji — Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:22:23 -0000

Really like the overview and nice comparison too!

Re: Comparing .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Part 1

colorchart — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:00:43 -0000

great article... Ive never really been into .net myself but its certainly something im thinking about... your comparisons make interesting reading and maybe changed my mind in what direction to take.. very well written article thank you.

Re: Comparing .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Part 1

David — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:11:53 -0000

Enjoyable Read! thanks for your time..

Re: Comparing .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Part 2

Eric J. Smith — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:24:10 -0000

Great review! This is exactly what I was looking for to help clear things up for me.

Re: Some thoughts on ASP.NET AJAX Roadmap

Robert — Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:14:22 -0000

Thank you, very informative, I am looking forward to see more thoughts on APS.NET AJAX 4.0

Re: Mocking internal interfaces with Moq

Patrick — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:28:55 -0000

Great, I was looking for that everywhere! Thanx!!!

Re: Comparing .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Part 2

Colin Jack — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 05:26:16 -0000

Good review, thanks for taking the time to do it.