<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Andrey Shchekin's Blog - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-4801441f" type="application/json"/><link>http://ashmind.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:20:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Custom mapping for NHibernate.Search</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2009/10/26/custom-mapping-for-nhibernate-search/#comment-23810906</link><description>Thank you very much.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">regisbsb</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:20:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Custom mapping for NHibernate.Search</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2009/10/26/custom-mapping-for-nhibernate-search/#comment-23691042</link><description>It is not like NHibernate.Search changed a lot, except for my mapping change.&lt;br&gt;Everything described here &lt;a href="http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2009/05/03/nhibernate-search-again.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2009/05/03/nhibe...&lt;/a&gt; is still relevant.&lt;br&gt;Also, there are query syntax rules: &lt;a href="http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_3_2/queryparsersyntax.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_3_2/queryparser...&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ashmind</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:11:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Custom mapping for NHibernate.Search</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2009/10/26/custom-mapping-for-nhibernate-search/#comment-23674656</link><description>Which samples? They are all very old I think.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">regisbsb</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:47:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Custom mapping for NHibernate.Search</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2009/10/26/custom-mapping-for-nhibernate-search/#comment-23657694</link><description>You mean the search syntax itself? I think it is pretty much unchanged from the Java Lucene.&lt;br&gt;In general Lucene tutorials + Ayende samples were fresh enough for me, do not know if there is something better.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ashmind</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:53:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Custom mapping for NHibernate.Search</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2009/10/26/custom-mapping-for-nhibernate-search/#comment-23657531</link><description>Hi, do you know where can I find some recent demo or tutorial using NHibernate.Search? Its all out dated in my searches.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">regisbsb</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:50:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unit Testing and the importance of naming</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2007/10/13/unit-testing-and-the-importance-of-naming/#comment-20765713</link><description>M$ engineers have more discipline on naming notation (more complains in its long history). Any wrong naming would cause the complain from all over the world. Gosh! :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Name</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:10:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comparing .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Part 2</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2008/09/08/comparing-net-di-ioc-frameworks-part-2/#comment-19485790</link><description>I see what you are trying to achieve more as MEF/System.AddIn functionality than as basic IoC.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will look at it when time allows, in the meanwhile you can use test suite at&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://code.google.com/p/net-ioc-frameworks/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://code.google.com/p/net-ioc-frameworks/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;to see how it corresponds to common IoC features.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ashmind</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 04:58:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comparing .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Part 1</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2008/08/19/comparing-net-di-ioc-frameworks-part-1/#comment-19485689</link><description>You can send it to ashmind [!] &lt;a href="http://gmail.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;gmail.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;However, this post is extremely obsolete (year ago), so I think it is a bit unfair to add anything to it unless I update situation on all other frameworks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand, I can add it to the test suite here &lt;a href="http://code.google.com/p/net-ioc-frameworks" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://code.google.com/p/net-ioc-frameworks&lt;/a&gt; (and update the wiki which does not include all tables at the moment).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ashmind</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 04:52:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comparing .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Part 1</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2008/08/19/comparing-net-di-ioc-frameworks-part-1/#comment-19473890</link><description>You state in the article that "If you feel that your framework should be here, just send me the values for all feature columns, and I’ll add it." but I'm having trouble finding exactly where I should send these values.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">openid-11694</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 23:06:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comparing .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Part 2</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2008/09/08/comparing-net-di-ioc-frameworks-part-2/#comment-19428682</link><description>Please, cay you see my framework &lt;a href="http://plugins.codeplex.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://plugins.codeplex.com&lt;/a&gt;. I'm luck of time so it hadn't been documented yet, but i'm very interested in comparison to other frameworks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hack2root</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:57:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Evaluating Javascript in WatiN</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2007/09/05/evaluating-javascript-in-watin/#comment-13578677</link><description>I think this can be done easier (without really involving JS).&lt;br&gt;But I have not worked with Watin for a year so I do not really remember anything.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ashmind</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:28:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Evaluating Javascript in WatiN</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2007/09/05/evaluating-javascript-in-watin/#comment-13553326</link><description>will these scripts help me to recognize radio buttons on Java script pop up?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smita</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:59:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comparing .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Part 2</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2008/09/08/comparing-net-di-ioc-frameworks-part-2/#comment-12857515</link><description>awesome articel, thanks for sharing  but sometimes frameworks are a bit difficult.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Veyton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:02:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Simple typeswitch in C# 3.0, Part 2: The Solutions</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2007/09/20/simple-typeswitch-in-c-30-part-2-the-solutions/#comment-8707932</link><description>Interesting post. Appreciate it as I have seen something new now.&lt;br&gt;Can I use this info on my blog using the direct link to your blog? Thanks in advance</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Clarityx</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:30:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Putting Web snapshots to practical use</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2008/09/28/putting-web-snapshots-to-practical-use/#comment-8102473</link><description>Well I had crash I think, and that was related to the fact that text was not set -- it required at least "" to be provided.&lt;br&gt;But they have fixed it since, so now everything should work well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can't really give an example since all my usage is commercial and it is hard to untie a meaningful example from the app itself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But can you provide the crash stack trace?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ashmind</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:29:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Putting Web snapshots to practical use</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2008/09/28/putting-web-snapshots-to-practical-use/#comment-7952365</link><description>Well, I drop a TextEditor component onto my form, and everhthing crashes. I suppose there is some 'proper' way to use it, but what I would really love is an example, because I could find none on the internet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitri Nesteruk</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:19:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Putting Web snapshots to practical use</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2008/09/28/putting-web-snapshots-to-practical-use/#comment-7568143</link><description>Ok, what exceptions are you getting? They might have broken something since the version I downloaded, or I could have occasionally set some options that is required by it to work correctly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ashmind</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:43:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Putting Web snapshots to practical use</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2008/09/28/putting-web-snapshots-to-practical-use/#comment-7568056</link><description>Hi, I saw your post on StackOverflow regarding use of AvalonEdit, so I ended up downloading it and playing with it a bit. Unfortunately, after an hour of exception after exception, I gave up. So I was wondering if I could blatantly ask for your help :) because I really want this to get working, but with a 0% documentation level in the API, I'm finding actually using AvalonEdit to be hell on earth. Pleeease?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitri Nesteruk</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:40:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: XHTML and microformats revisited</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2007/06/03/xhtml-and-microformats-revisited/#comment-6371283</link><description>thanks for sharing this article that is very helpful to me.&lt;br&gt;but am not able to understand that what is the difference between the html and xhtml.&lt;br&gt;can you explain it in the brief.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">harish</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:41:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: About</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/about/#comment-5655039</link><description>Thanks for sharing, I'll definitely read it.&lt;br&gt;Sorry for the chat, but I was quite busy with my job today.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll comment with any thoughts after I read the article.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ashmind</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:02:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: About</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/about/#comment-5649761</link><description>The article is now live at &lt;a href="http://www.codeproject.com/KB/aspnet/advancedwebforms-generics.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.codeproject.com/KB/aspnet/advancedwe...&lt;/a&gt; if you're interested.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:18:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: About</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/about/#comment-5647921</link><description>Hi, I was just about to post a tutorial on Code Project about generics in ASP .NET (using an example of the repeater to illustrate the point), and I've noticed there's a similar but different tutorial from you on there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just thought I'd give you a heads up, since my implementation seems at some levels very similar (I've also gone down the type, property delegation route), but also quite different (supporting *any* generic control types through marking up the types with attributes). Effectively what I do is mark up ITemplate properties with attributes saying which generic parameter indicies they refer to, and then instanciating the relevant container dynamically).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The control builder then uses an attribute on the 'concrete' class to specify the mapping of string properties to generic parameter indicies, allowing the real control to be instanciated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd love to have a chat with you before I post the tutorial to get your input on it, since you may have evolved the idea further since that tutorial was posted.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:36:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome &amp;#8212; short thoughts</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2008/09/02/google-chrome-short-thoughts/#comment-5546699</link><description>Could not be published any better. Reading this post reminds me of my previous roommie! He always kept on discussing this. I will be forwarding this post to him. Pretty certain he will be benefcial. Thank you for sharing!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stevenmartinez</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:43:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NMock 3.5</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2007/09/23/nmock-35/#comment-4912639</link><description>Yes NMock2 is alive. But there is quite a bit room for confusion because you have to go to &lt;a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/nmock2/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://sourceforge.net/projects/nmock2/&lt;/a&gt; and not &lt;a href="http://nmock.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;nmock.org&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;The reason is that the developers of NMock version 1.0 and 2.0 (&lt;a href="http://nmock.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;nmock.org&lt;/a&gt;) have stopped their development and it is continued by another team on &lt;a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/nmock2/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://sourceforge.net/projects/nmock2/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Back to lambdas:&lt;br&gt;Do you have a solution that supports defining expectations on properties and indexers as well?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Happy mocking &lt;br&gt;Urs</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Urs Enzler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:42:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comparing .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Part 2</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2008/09/08/comparing-net-di-ioc-frameworks-part-2/#comment-4789385</link><description>Fantastic comparison. Thanks for sharing</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pavan Kulkarni</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:02:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>