http://ashmind.disqus.com/enMon, 20 Dec 2010 22:42:45 -0000http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2009/10/12/net-di-ioc-frameworks-revisited/#comment-115666636<p>If curious about the performance of some of the most popular IOC containers take a look <a href="http://www.iocbattle.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.iocbattle.com">www.iocbattle.com</a>.<br></p>MartinMon, 20 Dec 2010 22:42:45 -0000http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2009/10/12/net-di-ioc-frameworks-revisited/#comment-26975815<p>Yes, I think while MEF is not just an IoC framework, it does contain an implementation of basic IoC framework. So I should add it to the review, will probably do later.</p>Andrey ShchekinTue, 22 Dec 2009 13:53:19 -0000http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2009/10/12/net-di-ioc-frameworks-revisited/#comment-26771732<p>There is now also the <a href="http://www.codeplex.com/MEF" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.codeplex.com/MEF">managed extensions framework</a>, which will be included in .NET 4.0 as the <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.componentmodel.composition(VS.100).aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.componentmodel.composition(VS.100).aspx">System.ComponentModel.Composition</a> namespace.<br><br>There is a lot of <a href="http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2008/09/25/the-managed-extensibility-framework.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2008/09/25/the-managed-extensibility-framework.aspx">handwaving</a> about MEF not being an IoC framework but I'm pretty sure that it belongs in this list.</p>Wim CoenenMon, 21 Dec 2009 09:50:09 -0000