<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Andrey Shchekin's Blog - Latest Comments in NMock 3.5</title><link>http://ashmind.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ashmind.disqus.com/nmock_35/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:21:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: NMock 3.5</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/2007/09/23/nmock-35/#comment-463255866</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andrey,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Really Great stuff. Can you share the code please. Email : vikram30capri@gmail.com&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vikram30capri</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:21:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NMock 3.5</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/2007/09/23/nmock-35/#comment-69536442</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You might be interested in my recent blog&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://lbsa71.net/2010/08/18/stringless-nmock2-method-names-with-c3-extension-methods-revisited/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://lbsa71.net/2010/08/18/stringless-nmock2-method-names-with-c3-extension-methods-revisited/"&gt;http://lbsa71.net/2010/08/1...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lbsa71</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:25:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NMock 3.5</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/2007/09/23/nmock-35/#comment-4912639</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes NMock2 is alive. But there is quite a bit room for confusion because you have to go to &lt;a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/nmock2/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://sourceforge.net/projects/nmock2/"&gt;http://sourceforge.net/proj...&lt;/a&gt; and not &lt;a href="http://nmock.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="nmock.org"&gt;nmock.org&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;The reason is that the developers of NMock version 1.0 and 2.0 (&lt;a href="http://nmock.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="nmock.org"&gt;nmock.org&lt;/a&gt;) have stopped their development and it is continued by another team on &lt;a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/nmock2/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://sourceforge.net/projects/nmock2/"&gt;http://sourceforge.net/proj...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Back to lambdas:&lt;br&gt;Do you have a solution that supports defining expectations on properties and indexers as well?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Happy mocking &lt;br&gt;Urs&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Urs Enzler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:42:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NMock 3.5</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/2007/09/23/nmock-35/#comment-4634812</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that's interesting.&lt;br&gt;I am subscribed to their newsgroup and there was only occasional activity for almost a year (consistent with no releases for a while).&lt;br&gt;It seems that they started releasing and the discussions moved elsewhere so that's the reason for my error.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However unless they already support .NET 3.5 syntax, it still seems for me that MoQ is easier to use for NET 3.5 projects.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrey Shchekin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 05:58:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NMock 3.5</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/2007/09/23/nmock-35/#comment-4631587</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;NMock2 seems to be dead for a while now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Latest release appears to be of December 06 2008 at sourceforge, and SVN statistics ( &lt;a href="http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/detail.php?group_id=109964&amp;amp;ugn=nmock2&amp;amp;type=svn&amp;amp;mode=60day" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/detail.php?group_id=109964&amp;amp;ugn=nmock2&amp;amp;type=svn&amp;amp;mode=60day"&gt;http://sourceforge.net/proj...&lt;/a&gt; ) shows some checkins :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why do you think it's "dead for a while"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 23:35:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NMock 3.5</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/2007/09/23/nmock-35/#comment-4588323</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks! I really recommend looking at Moq, however, since NMock2 seems to be dead for a while now.&lt;br&gt;I have moved to Moq and it saved me from writing a whole new API for NMock2 just to get more modern syntax.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also Moq people were very responsive at fixing bugs when they still had them.&lt;br&gt;I wish I could say the same about latest NMock2.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrey Shchekin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:49:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NMock 3.5</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/2007/09/23/nmock-35/#comment-4587234</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andrey,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nice one! I had a slightly different approach though (scroll downto "Improvements: NMock2 + C#3."  at &lt;a href="http://codevanced.net/post/Touching-a-hot-iron-NMock2.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://codevanced.net/post/Touching-a-hot-iron-NMock2.aspx"&gt;http://codevanced.net/post/...&lt;/a&gt; )&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:17:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NMock 3.5</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/2007/09/23/nmock-35/#comment-2506447</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks! Could you please give me your email?&lt;br&gt;Mine is ashmind+blog(at)&lt;a href="http://gmail.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="gmail.com"&gt;gmail.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrey Shchekin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 14:06:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NMock 3.5</title><link>http://blog.ashmind.com/2007/09/23/nmock-35/#comment-2506446</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow! Great job Andrey, It seems like expression trees will bring back life to NMock2.&lt;br&gt;Would you please send me copy of the code?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eyad.Salamin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:30:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>